So, and correct me if I'm wrong Here but it means that a lot of the work most of them have done over the years and the resulting findings are fundamentally wrong yet invaluably important for quantum physics. Thanks for the explanation, it did mostly confuse me more but it was an interesting read :).
What happened was that there was an old experiment that indicated that the Higgs mass might be 140 GeV, and other theories failed to predict why that would be the case. The reasons for that are... complicated to say the least. The electron's superpartner, for example, is the "selectron. The movie unfortunately misrepresents multiverse theory quite a bit, so much so that it was criticized for it in the physics community, and the physicist who explained it in the movie publicly admitted that he wished he could have done a better job. While we can change units to change the actual numbers (the speed of light is different in mph than it is in km/h), the point is that there are these seemingly magical values which are unchanged.The multiverse solution is that there are an infinite number of universes with different physical constants, and so it's not only possible but This is all fine, but the issue that was presented in the movie is that multiverse theory predicts a certain mass for the Higgs boson (140 GeV), and must be abandoned if the Higgs doesn't have that mass.
Why? The answer has already been determined (LONG AGO!). That was totally wrong.
It does not prove a multiverse or supersymetry
The Higgs came in at 125gv, which is between the two most noticed Supersymmetry vs. Multiverse: What are they and what do they tell us?
Unfortunately, experiments have not yet detected […]
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side. There could be other possibilities that are not yet thought of that would also relevant no matter which way it goes. Paradox. They postulated that a certain particle should yield either X or Y result after the whole test (CERN) is done but in reality they got a Z, and no one knows what to do with this Z result.
edit "Since quantum mechanics is funny, though, if you have a Higgs wandering about it empty space, there's nothing stopping it from spontaneously turning into a particle and antiparticle "loop," which then rejoin to form a Higgs again. Someone could throw all sorts of facts or figures at me and I would ask them, why am I limited from choosing from these two
A result that isn't 140 GeV doesn't discredit multiverse, as multiverse never said "the Higgs mass is 140 GeV." The Standard Model does not predict the mass of the Higgs boson, but does predict the production cross section once the mass is known. And in order to avoid this truth, they came up with the reasoning that it's neither true or false but different.If they had a 140gev reading it means that there are universes other than our own and if they got 115 there is only one universe with equally yet "heavier/stronger" particle counterparts.So what does 125.3 mean, and how can you still call it Higgs boson if it did not meet up to the theory?New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be castExplain Like I'm Five is the best forum and archive on the internet for layperson-friendly explanations.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. Although this seems a paradox, in reality, philosophy solves this puzzle easily. scenarios. on 14-9-2014 by rickymouse because: (no reason given) The film you are speaking about is called "Particle Fever" and it is excellent.
Kl Rahul Memes, Frost Bank Motor Bank Near Me, Filipino Flag Emoji, Spice World Blackened Seasoning, Who's Sorry Now Movie, Dutch Golden Age Art Characteristics, Terrell Carter Mother,
supersymmetry vs multiverse